Investigation: Jewish Press on Revolutionary Russia — Verified Quotations Only

TL;DR: Contemporary Anglo–Jewish periodicals (1919–1920) contain editorial language that parallel parts of Bolshevik rhetoric with Jewish ethical idealism and, in one American weekly, celebrate Jewish participation in the Russian revolution as a model for world transformation. This dossier cites digitized primaries (Internet Archive). §5 reproduces every bullet from a circulating graphic titled A Collection of Quotes from Jewish Periodicals on Bolshevism, each with an evidence assessment. §8 surveys major modern “working” definitions of antisemitism (IHRA, Nexus, JDA and their lineages) and why they clash—relevant whenever the same historical material is labeled hate speech or defended as scholarship. Companion: this repo’s in-house counter-frame—anti-monolith historiography and speech norms—is in Paradigm Threat — working definition of antisemitism. Interpretation here is standard historical sociology: Tsarist legal disability, pogrom waves, and WWI dislocation help explain why some Jewish intellectuals and communities experimented with revolutionary politics as a possible exit from violence — a hope that failed in practice when civil war, counter-revolutionary pogroms, Soviet state violence, and later Stalinism showed the revolution in exterminatory or assimilatory “wrong hands.” Nothing here implies a single Jewish intent, “Judaism = Marxism,” or collective guilt.

1. Method

Rule	Rationale
Primary or paginated secondary only	Flyers and forum lists routinely misdate, mistruncate, or invent lines.
Quote text aligned to digitized OCR, with cleanup noted	Archive.org DJVU-derived text has predictable errors (`Ihe` → the, etc.); cleaned wording below matches the sense of the line and should be checked against the image/PDF before legal or academic republication.
Do not treat editorial voice as “the community”	One London leader-writer or one New York weekly ≠ diaspora consensus.
Keep separate from Fomenko Ch.9 “treasury caste” framing	That is a different explanatory model; mixing without signposting confuses readers. See Disputes against Jews reemerge (timeline) for the NC strand.

2. Historical frame (mainstream, for context only)

Under the late Tsars, Jewish subjects in the Pale of Settlement faced residential restriction, quotas, double penalties, and recurrent pogroms (1880s onward; renewed brutality during the Russian Civil War on both sides of the fighting). World War I displaced populations and broke food and order. In that pressure cooker, socialism and liberal nationalism (Bundism, Zionism, Marxism, Folkspartey, etc.) competed for loyalty. Some Jews saw in February/October 1917 a chance for equal citizenship and an end to official antisemitism; others opposed the Bolsheviks from the first day. The quotations below illustrate how two English-language Jewish outlets wrote in that window — not who “controlled” the revolution.

3. Verified primary — Jewish Chronicle (London), 4 April 1919

Article: “Peace, War – and Bolshevism” (leader; appears on p. 7 of that issue per Internet Archive item metadata).

Digitized full text (DJVU-derived OCR): Internet Archive — B-001-018-446

Passage (cleaned from Archive OCR; verify against scan before citing as legal evidence):

There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism, some of which went to form the basis of the best teachings of the founder of Christianity—these are things which the thoughtful Jew will examine carefully. It is the thoughtless one who looks upon Bolshevism only in the repulsive aspects which all social revolutions assume…

Why it matters for your narrative: The paper acknowledges Jewish presence among Bolsheviks and argues that idealistic Jews may sympathise with stated revolutionary goals that echo ethical themes in Judaism — while warning the “thoughtless” reader not to stop at the ugly surface of any revolution. That is optimistic editorial rhetoric in wartime London, not a statistical claim about party membership.

4. Verified primary — The American Hebrew (New York), 10 September 1920

Note on dating: Secondary compilations often give 20 September; the Internet Archive clipping of the paragraph (uploaded as a standalone image artifact) attributes the line to 10 September 1920. This investigation follows that artifact date until a full volume page is pinned in hand.

Digitized artifact (image of the quoted block + attribution line): Internet Archive — the-bolshevik-revolution-was-the-product-of-jewish-brains-american-hebrew

Passage (from the same artifact; punctuation per scan):

“The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.” (The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920)

Bibliographic anchor for the full serial: HathiTrust catalog record for The American Hebrew & Jewish Messenger (searchable volumes include 1920): catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100113118 — use the Ohio State University scan osu.32435057876310 (vol. 107) to locate exact page and column in the bound volume.

Why it matters for your narrative: This is maximalist boosterism from one New York weekly: it treats Jewish participation in the Russian revolution as evidence of capacity and projects similar world-scale change. It does not prove conspiracy, funding chains, or unified intent. It does show that some Jewish-American editorialists celebrated the event in ethno-religious terms — language that later propagandists recycled out of context.

5. Complete inventory — graphic A Collection of Quotes from Jewish Periodicals on Bolshevism

The following reproduces each item as it appears on the graphic (wording may follow common flyer variants). Assessment = whether you can cite it responsibly as printed after checking primaries.

#	Text as on graphic (or reconstructed where cut off)	Claimed source	Assessment
1	“Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.”	Rabbi Stephen Wise, The American Bulletin, 5 May 1935	Do not cite. Widely treated as spurious: not located in Wise’s archived papers; inconsistent with Wise’s documented anti-communism. Appears almost exclusively in secondary propaganda lists.
2	“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism.”	The Jewish Chronicle (London), 4 April 1919	Cite with primary check. Substance verified in digitized issue (leader “Peace, War – and Bolshevism,” p. 7); flyer slightly misquotes — authoritative wording is “at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism” (see §3).
3	“What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind are tending to promote in other countries…. The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”	New York American Hebrew, 20 September 1920 (graphic)	Cite primary; fix date. Long passage verified in spirit and core sentences against digitized artifact; graphic date 20 Sep is likely wrong — IA clipping gives 10 September 1920 (see §4). First sentences about “Jewish idealism” need confirmation in bound volume page image.
4	“Whatever the racial antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet commissariats were largely staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the Communist movement was well understood in Russia. The White Armies which opposed the Bolshevik government linked Jews and Bolsheviks as common enemies”	The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia	Secondary / tertiary encyclopedia prose, not a periodical quote. UJE is a real reference set (1939–1943). Cite only with volume + page; do not treat as representative of all Jews; content is descriptive history of early Soviet staffing and White propaganda linkage — accurate at the level of “this is what the encyclopedia said,” not proof of motive.
5	“In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population.”	Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin (1987)	Do not cite the numbers without opening the book to the exact page and comparing to academic demography (e.g. contemporary membership surveys show far lower Jewish share in the 1920s party than 52%). Book is contested (disputed interview / reconstructed dialogue in reviews).
6	“Half of the six members of the politburo that was the supreme government of Soviet Russia in 1920 were Jews. The first head of the Soviet secret police was Jewish. Jews were prominent in the leadership of the Communist party in Germany, Hungary, and Austria. In the 1920s close to half the members of the small and politically insignificant American Communist party were Jewish.”	Norman Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews (1995)	Secondary synthesis — cite with edition + page. Cantor’s book exists (often 1994 first printing; 1995 reprint). Claims are broad-brush; “half” of 1920 Politburo and other clauses need page-level check and cross-check with biographical reference works; not a Jewish periodical quote.
7	“The founders of the Soviet secret police [later KGB], headquartered in Lubyanka prison in Moscow, were mostly Jews. Jews also took leadership roles, down into the early 1950s, in the Communist parties of Germany, Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Rumania. In the struggle for succession to Lenin in the 1920s… most of the high-level Soviet Jews made the mistake of supporting Stalin, an Asiatic anti-Semite who in the purge trials in the mid-1930s eventually eliminated these Jewish ‘Old Bolsheviks.’”	Norman Cantor, Stalin’s Jews (1996)	Do not cite this attribution. “Stalin’s Jews” (1996) is not a standard Norman F. Cantor trade title; this is almost certainly a garbled or invented citation. If the paragraph exists in print, it may be from The Sacred Chain or another author — re-locate before citing.
8	“Three of the six members of Lenin’s first Politburo, Trotsky, Kamenev, and Zinoviev, were of Jewish origin. Trotsky, in addition was commissar of defense and organized and commanded the Red Army during the civil war that followed the October Revolution. Kamenev and Zinoviev became members of the triumvirate [along with Stalin] that ruled the Soviet Union immediately after Lenin’s death in 1924. Other prominent Jews in the early Soviet government included Yakov Sverdlov, president of the Communist party central committee, Maxim Litvinov, commissar for foreign affairs, and Karl Radek, who served as press commissar. In subsequent years, Jews continued to play major roles throughout the Soviet state. Lazar Kaganovich, for example, was [graphic cuts off]”	(graphic: no source line visible)	Incomplete + not a periodical quote. Biographical claims are partly checkable against standard reference (who sat on early bodies, who was Jewish by background), but without the book/page the graphic implied, this is not citeable as presented. Trotsky was People’s Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs — flyer wording “commissar of defense” is loose.

Graphic-level note: The compilation mixes (a) real 1919–1920 Anglo–Jewish press, (b) encyclopedia summary, (c) disputed pop biography, (d) mis-cited Cantor, (e) spurious Wise — a pattern typical of selective-quote leaflets. Use §3–4 for anything that must stand up in an argument.

6. Optional sources (do not quote here until pinned)

Source	Status
Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1939–1943) — passage on early Soviet commissariats	Needs volume + page in a copy you control; paraphrase in flyers is not sufficient.
Norman F. Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews	Needs edition + page for any demographic sentence; treat as one historian’s synthesis, not a primary.
Any title “Stalin’s Jews” (1996) attributed to Cantor	Reject — not a standard Cantor bibliography entry; likely garbled citation.
Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin (1987) — e.g. “52% CPSU Jewish”	Do not cite the statistic without verifying the exact page and cross-checking against academic membership studies; the book is contested as biography.

7. Do not cite (common flyer / propaganda list)

Claimed line	Problem
“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism” — Rabbi Stephen Wise, American Bulletin, 1935	Not found in Wise’s archived papers per longstanding archivist and scholarly notes; inconsistent with Wise’s anti-communist posture. Treat as spurious unless a verified primary issue surfaces.
Block quotes attributed to *Norman Cantor, Stalin’s Jews* (1996)**	Fictive or mis-merged citation; use real Cantor titles with page numbers instead.
Demographic percentages from uncritical reuse of Kahan or anonymous web tables	High error rate; cite peer-reviewed Soviet/Jewish demography instead.

8. Annex: “Versions” of antisemitism — lineages and the modern definition fight

This annex is not legal advice. It maps formal, published frameworks that institutions use today when they adjudicate speech, policy, or discipline. Older usage (Christian anti-Judaism, racial pseudoscience, Soviet “rootless cosmopolitanism” campaigns, Islamist propaganda, far-right street violence) differs in shape from codified “working definitions,” but those histories feed why definitional fights feel existential to different communities.

Author sentiment (linked dossier): The maintainer treats IHRA-style adoption—when used as a blunt speech code—as often negligent for honest history: it can chill exactly the kind of sourced, disaggregated work this file does (who wrote what, who opposed what), and it can worsen the holy-war mood by forcing secretive reading. That is why a separate in-repo definition exists—not to deny that classical antisemitism is real, but to preserve room for Jewish disagreement, non-religious power analysis, and imperial-decline narratives without automatic collective guilt.

8.0 Paradigm Threat — in-repo working definition (companion)

For a single-paragraph norm sized alongside IHRA/JDA cores, plus premises (monolithing vs dissent, Israel criticism, ancestry research, optional NC/imperial frame, Protestant/CIA wedge thesis), see:

Paradigm Threat — working definition of antisemitism

8.1 Pre-codification senses (still in ordinary language)

Sense	Rough content	Note
Religious anti-Judaism	Theological polemic, conversionary pressure, exclusion from guilds or office	Not identical to modern racial antisemitism, but overlaps in violence and stereotype.
Racial / political “antisemitism” (late 19th c.)	Pseudoscientific “Jewish race,” conspiracy tropes, party antisemitism (e.g. Wilhelm Marr’s political coinage in German)	Supplies iconography later copied by flyers and memes.
State antisemitism	Legal disabilities (Tsarist Pale, numerus clausus), quotas, pogroms, genocide	Material context for §2 of this dossier.
Anti-Zionism / anti-Israel politics (contested boundary)	Opposition to a state or ideology vs. hostility to Jews as Jews	Precisely where modern definitions disagree (§8.5).

8.2 Lineage: European Monitoring Centre (2005) → IHRA (2016)

2005 — European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) “working definition.” A short core text plus illustrative examples (including several on Israel). The document was later withdrawn as an EUMC “working definition” but its text carried forward in civil-society use and informed later drafting. (See historical overview at Working Definition of Antisemitism — Wikipedia and primary-adjacent discussion in human-rights literature.)
2016 — International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) “non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism,” adopted at the Bucharest plenary (26 May 2016). Official consolidated text and examples: IHRA PDF.

IHRA core (verbatim):

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

The IHRA instrument adds eleven examples (some concern speech about Israel). It explicitly states that “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.” Adoption is voluntary (governments, universities, sports bodies); it is not a treaty and not by itself criminal law—though jurisdictions may reference it in policy or hate-crime guidance.

8.3 Nexus (United States, ~2021–2023)

The Nexus Document and related Nexus Project materials (University of California–affiliated scholarship; white paper May 2023) offer a complementary framework: how to tell when criticism of Israel or Zionism crosses into antisemitism in context, without equating all political anti-Zionism with bigotry. The U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism (May 2023) names IHRA as one useful tool and welcomes Nexus as a resource for education and clarity. See Nexus Project — definitions and the strategy PDF via White House archive copy.

Contrast in one sentence: IHRA lists stand-alone examples (hotly debated as to scope); Nexus stresses nexus—linked harms, patterns, and Jewish-targeting—rather than treating single slogans as dispositive.

8.4 Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism (JDA) — March 2021

Issued by a large group of scholars in Jewish studies, Holocaust studies, and Middle East studies as a non-legally binding alternative to IHRA. Official site: jerusalemdeclaration.org.

JDA core definition (verbatim):

Antisemitism is discrimination, prejudice, hostility or violence against Jews as Jews (or Jewish institutions as Jewish).

The JDA adds fifteen guidelines, including sections that list conduct that is on the face of it antisemitic versus conduct that is on the face of it not antisemitic in Israel–Palestine debates (e.g. it states that BDS is not, in and of itself, antisemitic; that “double standard” criticism alone is not sufficient; that evidence-based state criticism is permissible). The preamble argues IHRA is unclear, over-broad in application, and has fuelled controversy that weakens anti-antisemitism work.

8.5 Why the definitions war matters for historical quotation

Axis	IHRA-aligned concern	JDA / civil-liberties-aligned concern
Flyers like §5	Recycling Jewish power / Bolshevik tropes can fall under conspiracy and collective blame examples.	Context: academic or forensic reproduction of primary sources may still need framing so it is not read as endorsement of the trope.
Scholarly or NC writing	Some argue sharp criticism of Israel or Zionism should be monitored with IHRA examples.	JDA/Nexus warn against chilling legitimate rights-based or anti-nationalist speech; dispute whether certain IHRA examples conflate policy opposition with antisemitism.
Institutional adoption	Many states and bodies endorse IHRA for training and diplomacy.	Faculty unions, human-rights lawyers, and Palestine-solidarity networks often oppose mandatory IHRA on speech and hiring grounds.

Takeaway for this dossier: Verifying what a 1919 newspaper actually said (§3–4) is orthogonal to, but politically entangled with, which definition a reader uses to classify reprinting that material today. Cite primaries; separate historical description from normative accusation; when operating inside an IHRA-adopting institution, add scholarly framing explicit enough to pass context-sensitive review.

8.6 Further reading (selected)

IHRA: Working definition PDF.
JDA: jerusalemdeclaration.org.
Nexus: nexusproject.us — Nexus definition.
U.S. National Strategy (2023): White House PDF.
Historical line on EUMC → IHRA: Wikipedia — Working Definition of Antisemitism (convenient chronology; follow footnotes to primary sources for serious work).

9. Sources (this dossier)

Jewish Chronicle, London, 4 April 1919, leader “Peace, War – and Bolshevism,” p. 7 — Internet Archive full text.
The American Hebrew, New York, 10 September 1920 (date per IA clipping artifact) — quoted paragraph: Internet Archive image item; full serial: HathiTrust catalog.

Keywords: #Investigation #JewishChronicle #AmericanHebrew #Bolshevism #1919 #1920 #PrimarySources #Verified #QuoteGraphic #Inventory #Antisemitism #IHRA #JDA #Nexus #Definitions #ParadigmThreatWorkingDefinitionAntisemitism